Haunted by the death of the fiancé, Florence spends her time debunking supernatural claims, using methodical and rational explanations to disprove the notion that the dead can still haunt us. She feels compelled to accept a request to go to Rookwood, a boarding school in the countryside where a boy has recently been found dead and rumours about a ghostly boy haunting the school are causing panic amongst pupils and parents alike.
Florence sets to work immediately, laying traps, gathering scientific evidence, uncovering secrets and seemingly unravelling the mystery. However, as Florence is about to leave, she has a chilling spectral encounter which defies all of her rational beliefs and sets her on a journey toward a heartbreaking climax…
After the recent news that Paranormal Activity 4 will be released on October 19, it has now been revealed Joost and Schulman will return as directors, this time with several more months to prepare. Bloody Disgusting exclusively broke the news of the film’s returning directors. They don’t have any additional information on what the film will focus on, but, we can speculate in one of two directions based on the third film.
The first Paranormal Activity set the stage by showing a haunting in the house of a girl named Katie. The second film showed how that haunting came to be, originating in the house of her sister Kristi, and where a possessed Katie went after the end of the first movie. It was sort of a prequel tagged with sequel elements. Paranormal Activity 3 added a few seconds to the story of the second before jumping back to the 1980s when Katie and Kristi were pre-teens. There it showed them being haunted and revealed that it was because of the ritual beliefs of their grandmother. Either it can go back in the past and show why Katie and Kristi’s grandmother got all wacky or it can jump ahead (something the third film was lacking) and explain what is going on with the now possessed Katie and her nephew, who she’s kidnapped from her dead sister… stay tuned.
Guillermo del Toro (born October 9, 1964) is a Mexican director, producer, screenwriter, novelist and designer. He is mostly known for his acclaimed films, ‘Blade II’, ‘Pan’s Labyrinth’ and the ‘Hellboy’ film franchise.
He first got involved in filmmaking when he was about eight years old and studied special effects and make-up with legendary SFX artist Dick Smith. He spent eight years as a special effects make-up designer and formed his own company, Necropia. Guillermo wrote and directed ‘Cronos’ in 1993. A Mexican horror film starring veteran Argentine actor Federico Luppi and American actor Ron Perlman, the first of several films on which del Toro, Luppi and Perlman have collaborated.
In 1998, at the age of 34, Guillermo was given a $30 million budget from Miramax to shoot his second film, ‘Mimic’. During this time, his father, Federico del Toro, was kidnapped in Guadalajara, Mexico. Although Federico was eventually released safely, the event prompted Del Toro, his parents and his siblings to move abroad.
In 2001, del Toro wrote, directed and produced ‘The Devil’s Backbone’, a gothic thriller set in Spain, 1939 during the Spanish Civil War. the film follows Carlos (Fernando Tielve), a young boy who arrives at an orphanage, thinking that he will be staying there temporarily, until his father returns from the war. Carlos then sees a ghost of a boy in the kitchen doorway… The movie was a critical and commercial success, enough to warrant another Hollywood project.
He was entrusted with the sequel to comic book vampire hit Blade, ‘Blade II’ was a better film than it’s predeccessor and to date the most successful in the franchise. Taking up the action two years after the first movie, Blade has been killing vampires in Russia and Eastern Europe before a new challenge arrises. Decribed brilliantly at time of release as “Blade II is for those undiscriminating movie-goers who want nothing more from a trip to the multiplex than loud, raucous, mindless entertainment.”
In 2004, he wrote and directed his dream project, ‘Hellboy’ based on the graphic novels by Mike Mignola. Starring Ron Perlman as Hellboy, a demonic beast who secretly works to keep the world safe from paranormal threats. The movie is visually spectacular and was successful enough to warrant a sequel in 2008. ‘Hellboy II: The Golden Army’, also written and directed by del Toro.
In 2006, del Toro released his best film to date, ‘Pan’s Labyrinth’. The film takes place in Spain in May–June 1944, five years after the Spanish Civil War, during the early Franco period. The narrative of the film interweaves this real world with a fantasy world centered around an overgrown abandoned labyrinth and a mysterious faun creature, with which the main character, Ofelia, interacts. Ofelia’s stepfather, Captain Vidal, hunts the Spanish rebels who fight against the Fascist reign in the region, while Ofelia’s pregnant mother grows increasingly ill. Ofelia meets several strange and magical creatures who become central to her story, leading her through the trials of the old labyrinth garden. The film won three Academy Awards for Best Art Direction, Cinematography and Make-Up.
Since the release of the Hellboy sequel, del Toro hasn’t directed another movie. He has however been incredibly busy writing and producing work for others. In a production capacity he brought us ‘The Orphanage’ (2007), ‘Splice’ (2009), ‘Julia’s Eyes’ (2010), ‘Kung-Fu Panda 2′ (2011) and ‘Don’t be Afraid of the Dark’ (2011) among others. He was bust for a considerable time writing the screenplay for the forthcoming adaptation of Tolkeins ‘The Hobbit’ which he was going to direct. he has since left the project and has four films lined up for Universal: ‘Frankenstein’, ‘Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde’, ‘Slaughterhouse Five’ and ‘Pacific Rim’… the slate keeps changing, however whatever he decides to do, I’ll see.
Check out the new trailer for Paranormal Activity 3… and don’t forget to click on the link and Tweet Sydney to be included for one of 20 exclusive screenings. Click here
Tim Burton’s latest film, an update of campy classic television series ‘Dark Shadows’ has already drawn quite a few negative reactions from online sites and the gossip magazines, all from people who haven’t seen any footage… Prompting Warner brothers to release a few official images to try to counter the negative publicity. Check out the on set report at UK Empire and official Press release at Entertainment Weekly.
Dark Shadows cast: Helena Bonham Carter as Dr. Julia Hoffman; Chloe Grace Moretz as Carolyn Stoddard; Eva Green as Angelique Bouchard; Gulliver McGrath as David Collins; Bella Heathcote as Vitoria Winters; Johnny Depp as Barnabas; Ray Shirley as Mrs. Johnson; Jackie Earle Haley as Willie Loomis; Jonny Lee Miller as Roger Collins; and Michelle Pfeiffer as Elizabeth Collins Stoddard.
In Rochester, a young girl has been abducted, raped and murdered. The FBI believe that the killer is a drifter; Detective Megan Paige (Eliza Dushku) believes otherwise. She thinks that the killer knew the girl and selected her because her first and last initials and area her body was dumped all began with the letter ‘C’; she also believes that he will kill again. She works obsessively, her mental state fragments and she starts to see visions of the dead girl; unable to find any leads she has a complete breakdown and in despair, slits her wrists.
After therapy and on medication, Megan is reinstated, working on limited duties in the records office and on reception duties. However, she is vindicated when another murder follows the same pattern, a young girl, same first and last initial and area where the body was discovered all match her theory. Back on the case Megan starts to get closer to the killer as another murder takes place…
The Alphabet Killer has some good ideas but none of them are implemented very well. The script, direction and acting are all average at best.
I must admit to watching this movie for two reasons, one, that is another ‘based on real events’ thriller and I was attempting to watch as many as I could before compiling a list of the good and bad serial killer movies; however the main reason is that I quite like Eliza Dushku, however her looks can only get her so far. She isn’t the only one who puts in a poor performance; most of the cast are either trying to hard or not at all. Which is disappointing as the supporting cast; Timothy Hutton, Cary Elwes, Tom Noonan and Bill Moseley are all generally good. Can someone please give Timothy Hutton a good role before his talent is completely wasted.
The scriptwriter Tom Molloy and director Rob Schmidt don’t seem to be sure exactly what it is they’re aiming for. The movie tries too hard to be all things to everyone and doesn’t work on any level. There are good moments and it is photographed well, however as a whole the movie is too stereotypical, predictable and clichéd to recommend. Schmidt directed ‘Wrong Turn’ (2003), which although not a classic was much more enjoyable. If you want to see some good serial killer detective thrillers, stick with Manhunter, Silence of the Lambs, Se7en or Zodiac and give this a miss.
Quality: 2 out of 5 stars
Any good: 1 out of 5 stars
An English-language remake of Juan Antonio Bayona’s ‘The Orphanage’ (2007) has been in the works for a few years now, but it hit a rough patch in 2009 when would-be director Larry Fessenden left the project after dealing with casting issues. It seems his successor Mark Pellington (The Mothman Prophecies, Arlington Road and U2 3D) may be having somewhat better luck on that front.
According to a new report, producers are eyeing three-time Academy Award nominee Amy Adams to play the lead in the film. Adams has entered talks with New Line for the part of Laura, who returns to the orphanage where she grew up with the intention of turning it into a home for disabled children. However, her plans take an unexpected and disturbing twist when her young son befriends a mysterious imaginary friend who wears a mask.
Pellington will be directing The Orphanage from a screenplay written by Fessenden and Sergio Sanchez, back when Fessenden was still set to direct. Guillermo del Toro is producing the remake, as he did the original. Personally, I’d rather they left it alone…
Another review by my 5½ year old son. He can’t wait for Harry Potter (he’ll have to wait for me to see it first to make sure it’ll be okay for him… which he’s not happy about) so he knocked off this review of Ghostbusters which he saw for the first time at the weekend.
Ghostbusters is about ghosts and Ghostbusters. The Ghostbusters are guys who stop the ghosts from causing trouble. It’s about gargoyles that break out of the gargoyle statues and come alive. And it is about one skeleton ghost and a green ghost. It is about a giant marshmallow man and the Ghostbusters were attacking it and it looks good but it isn’t really. It is a little bit scary for little kids.
Rating 4 stars out of 5
Another review from my 5 year old son. He couldn’t wait until the weekend to review ‘Transformers: Dark of the Moon’ so knocked out this review until he sees that behemoth on Saturday afternoon. This is more of a synopsis than a review. SPOILER ALERT. He gives away the ending. I usually edit out huge spoilers from his movie reviews but figured that this is so old now and no-one is going to rent it anyway.
“It’s about a spooky house that’s called a mansion. It’s about ghosts and graveyards. A man and a woman give some people some cookies. There’s a nice ghost. The nice ghost helps the man get his children out of a box from the skeletons that are spooky. The bad ghost can’t get hurt by anyone but in the end he gets fire on him and the good guy is okay. It’s not too scary for kids but little kids might get scared. It’s spooky and funny but spooky.”
Any good ***
1966, Kristen (Amber Heard), a beautiful but troubled young woman burns down a remote farmhouse and is incarcerated in a remote ward in the psychiatric hospital. She has no idea why she is there and no memory of her life before the fire. Kristen is treated by Doctor Stringer (Jared Harris) and his stereotypically brutal staff, Nurse Lundt (Susanna Burney) and orderly Roy (D.R. Anderson).
In the ward Kristen meets four other disturbed girls, Emily (Mamie Gummer), Sarah (Danielle Panabaker), Zoë (Laura Leigh) and Iris (Lindsay Fonseca). They are four very distinct characters with a shared secret. Who was Tammy, the girl who had Kristen’s room before she arrived? Who is Alice? Who is walking the halls at night and more disturbingly why are the other girls starting to disappear?
Kristen is determined to escape before she becomes the next victim.
The cast of girls are all okay, and although each of them is playing fairly stereotypical roles, they deliver decent performances. Sadly I can’t say the same about Jared Harris as Dr. Stringer, Susanna Burney or D.R Anderson, they are quite wooden. Amber Heard has the most to do and is obviously relishing the role. She’s a good physical presence and instils Kristen with some believability.
The Ward is John Carpenters first movie as a director in seven years and he has made a return to the psychological thriller genre in which he made his name. The movie retains most of his stylistic touches, forced perspective, extreme angles and tracking shots; it is very much a Carpenter movie. He makes good use of the limited sets and creates a typically sinister atmosphere.
The make-up effects are good as they are; however, the extra expense incurred by adding the CG overlay has backfired. Once again a modern genre flick has been hampered by some shoddy CGI that removes us from any involvement in the featured scenes. Carpenter directed the pioneering effects movie ‘The Thing’, surely of all horror genre directors he’s aware of the impact that good effects can have.
The Ward is part horror film, part psychological thriller and as such it works fairly well. However if you’ve seen ‘Shutter Island’ or ‘Identity’ there’s nothing much new to see here. Not the return to form of ‘Halloween’, ‘Escape From New York’ or ‘The Thing’ but better than Carpenters last few movies as director, although it will take more than this to erase memories of ‘Ghosts of Mars’. An okay movie but not the return to form we’d hoped for; current scream queen of the moment Heard is good and overall the movie is worth the effort. Check out the trailer here
Quality: 3 out of 5 stars
Any good: 2 out of 5 stars
Five college kids Gretchen (Tina Illman), Trip (Scott Whyte), Cookie (Arielle Kebbel), Nelson (Derek Richardson) and ‘Blind’ Jack (Devon Gummersall) share a ride through the desert to a rave. They are all different personalities and we are given a few thankfully brief moments to get to know them before Gretchen decides to throw Trip out of her SUV as he has a bag full of stolen ecstasy tablets. Not wanting to ditch him in the middle of the desert they agree to take him back to the gas station/diner/motel that they stopped at on the way. However once there they discover that the previously busy place is now deserted, their SUV has run out of fuel and alarmingly, find themselves the target of a foul-smelling, deranged killer with a penchant for dismembering his victims. They are joined by drug manufacturer Radford (Eric Mabius) who wants his drugs back and (Michael Ironside) who is looking for his missing wife, but he may not be telling them the entire truth…
Directed solidly enough by David Payne, the movie throws up just enough information to give us clues, keep the interest levels up and moves along at a good pace.
Although it’s done well enough, Reeker offers nothing really new to the dusty, desolate location stalked by a killer scenario; other than the ‘smell’ factor, the reason for which is revealed towards the latter part of the movie. The story is fairly simple and the characters are slightly different from the average jock, nerd, and hot girl etc., college kids by numbers that are usually thrown together in slasher flicks; however we still want to see them killed and any real lack of empathy with any of the characters makes that easy. The major distinct change is ‘Blind’ Jack, although his alleged heightened sense of smell proves to be wasted as far as story point possibilities are concerned.
The design of the ‘Reeker’ is pretty good but the finished look is not, CGI doesn’t work in horror movies. They should have delayed showing him and then used that saved time and energy in fewer shots to raise the overall quality. The ‘woozy’ smell effect is terrible, it cheapens the movie and isn’t necessary; having the characters reacting would suffice.
The scenario has been done before, and better, in ‘Identity’ and some of the ‘Final Destination’ movies. Having said that, at least it tried to do something new and that’s something that is very rare in American horror films these days.
It’s hard to know what to make of ‘Reeker’, I can’t say too much about the plot without giving away pointers towards the ending, which depending on your previous viewing history will leave you pleasantly surprised or groaning. However the final coda after what should have been the ending feels tacked on and unnecessary.
There’s a 2008 sequel: No Man’s Land: The Rise of the Reeker. Haven’t seen it and in no hurry to.
Quality: Well made 3 out of 5 stars
Any good: 2 out of 5 stars (a point off for shoddy CGI effects and the final ending)
The trailer for ‘Insidious’ is excellent, it’s incredibly well put together, looks great and ends with a fantastic line of dialogue and an unnerving shot of a terrifying claw-handed figure in the shadows of a kids bedroom. I loved it and was desperate to see this film; usually with each new horror release that comes along we get a pretty good trailer and are let down by the final product. Not with Insidious.
Josh (Patrick Wilson) and Renai (Rose Byrne) move into a huge new house, it’s perfect for them and their 3 children, the eldest of whom, Dalton (Ty Simpkins – another scary kid to add to the growing list) is terrified of something. There are strange noises in the house, things move by their own volition and one night Ty investigates, falls and bumps his head. The next morning falls into what appears to be a coma; the doctors are confounded, he doesn’t get any better and after a few months he’s allowed to go home under the care of a day nurse. This is when things get worse, the odd activities in the house increase, Renai is terrified and starts to see the ghosts; then the bloody hand print on Daltons bed sheet is the last straw. Unlike most other haunted house thrillers the family here move out, at last someone in this situation gets it… or so we think.
Despite the move the situation worsens. As a last resort Josh and Renai decide to bring in the help of two paranormal investigators (Leigh Whannell and Angus Sampson) and psychic Elise Reiner (Liz Shaye). Reiner delivers the fantastic line that was used so well in the trailer: “It’s not the house that’s haunted, it’s your son”. The film takes an unexpected turn from here to the end, go with it and you’ll probably love the movie… if you don’t then you’ll probably feel a little let down.
Insidious was written by the ‘Saw’ team of Director James Wan and Actor Leigh Whannell and they’ve crafted a genuinely creepy and in some parts terrifying movie. The scares all derive from the tension that Wan ratchets up from the very start. He doesn’t throw in all the fake scares that are commonplace these days, no ‘closing the bathroom cabinet to reveal…’ or ‘nearing a sound in a wardrobe only for it to be a cat’ etc. Instead the movie concentrates on building the tension and creepy atmosphere so we’re on edge throughout.
As you would expect with the likes of Patrick Wilson, Rose Byrne and Barbara Hershey (as Renai’s mother), the actors are all good. Even Whannell turns in a kooky performance that works and Liz Shaye is definitely channelling Zelda Rubinstein from Poltergeist. Which brings us to the script; it’s obviously very well written and researched… and by researched I mean it lifts freely from any number of classic horror films of the past: Poltergeist, Amityville Horror, The Exorcist and The Omen. It also features similar themes to ‘Paranormal Activity 2′ which is no surprise as it’s co-produced by Jason Blum. That’s not a complaint as at least they’ve come up with some new and different ideas. The script is also quite funny but not in a ‘Scream 4’ way, the humour here works with the movie.
Quality: 4 out of 5 stars
Any good: 3 out of 5 stars
Head girl Justine (Tuppence Middleton) delivers a eulogy at the funeral of Darren Mullet (Calvin Dean), a schoolmate who has just committed suicide, she was unaware of who he was. After the service Justine is invited to a party by Alexis (Dimitri Leonidas), one of the ‘cool crowd’ from the school. The crowd are led by sociopath Bradley (Alex Pettyfer) and his bitchy girlfriend Natasha (April Pearson). At the party each member of the group start to get text messages from Mullets mobile phone, they assume that one of the other school nerds is sending them…
Mullets only real friend, Jason (Olly Alexander) is picked on mercilessly by the group as they assume he’s behind the text messages, he’s not.
One at a time the group are killed by an unknown assailant; the first one to die is Jez (Ben Hughes) the party DJ, a try-hard faux gantsa, I was pleased to see him go. I was pleased to see most of them get killed actually as they are a horrible group of kids.
Each of the students who are killed believe that they can see Mullet in windows and mirrors prior to eventually dying. Who kills them? Is it Mullet returned from the grave, his nerdy friends or someone in the guise of Mullet..? Justine she tries to decipher who’s behind the murders; and why Mullet killed himself, is her new boyfriend Alexis partly responsible?
Some of the deaths include a stake through the heart, head impaled on an iron railing, drowning, decapitation by shovel, hands cut off by a paper guillotine and screwdriver to the hand and neck. They’re done fairly well apart from the impaling scene… bad CGI, my pet hate in horror movies.
The story starts out well enough but descends into predictability fairly quickly. There’s a ‘twist’ that’s telegraphed miles in advance which is a shame as it could have been a pretty good little horror thriller, it’s not. The acting varies with only Alex Pettyfer standing out as a potential star.
The opening titles are well designed and add a nice touch to an otherwise average movie.
SPOILER ALERT. Its obvious early on that Mullet has returned from the dead and that Justine is going to end up taking the blame. The movie tries to give a clue at the end that it may be Justine but it’s not smart enough to pull it off. After the credits start to roll there’s a nice little gag where they show the schools thuggish physical education teacher about to get his comeuppance at the hands of Mullet.
Quality: 2 out of 5 stars (well made on a low budget)
Any good: 2 out of 5 stars (could have been better)
Sarah Campbell (Virginia Madsen) is desperate to get the best possible treatment for her terminally ill son, Matt (Kyle Gallner). She relocates the family nearer to the clinic in Connecticut to avoid the long commutes that are too difficult for Matt. They rent a huge old house that was once a funeral parlour. Why do people do these things..? Would you live in a creepy looking old house that was once an old funeral parlour..? Hasn’t she heard of the Amityville Horror..?
As soon as they move in Matt decides to sleep in the basement and starts to see and hear things. He’s told not to mention it to anyone as if he has hallucinations he’ll be dropped from the experimental cancer treatment he’s undergoing. So the poor boy has to suffer, and suffer he does as his visions become clearer and more intense.
It turns out that the basement was the parlour morgue, oh, and where a bunch of horrific experiments took place for added measure… Matt is haunted by a spirit called Jonah who used to be a medium when séances where held at the parlour decades earlier… GET OUT, GET OUT NOW..!
But no, the family all suffer, his parent’s relationship starts to unravel under the pressure, his siblings see burned ghosts and his cousin is attacked in the shower.
Matt is told by Reverend Popescu that there are evil spirits in the house and that they can see him and he see them because he is near to death. Matt tries to communicate with them but things only get worse…
A Haunting in Connecticut isn’t a bad film. It’s just not a particularly good one either. However it’s better than most of the recent ‘haunting’ stories we’ve suffered through over the last few years.
The cast are all good; especially Virginia Madsen and Kyle Gallner who as the tortured Matt manages to convey the terrible symptoms of his sickness and his gradual mental decline.
Director Peter Cornwell manages to build the tension well during the first hour and overall delivers a fairly creepy movie. The cinematography is fine and the effects are done quite well. That is apart from the CGI ectoplasm shots. I hate obvious CGI effects in horror film as they immediately remove me from the moment.
The film is riddled with clichés but maybe all of these ‘based on a true story’ movies suffer from the same clichés because they all tend to happen in similar circumstances… allegedly. Or they suffer from lazy scriptwriters and lazy directors… probably.
Preferably check out ‘The Orphanage’, ‘The Devils Backbone’, ‘The Others’ and the Robert Wise movie ‘The Haunting’ a real classic.
Quality: 3 out of 5 stars
Is it good: 2 out of 5 stars
I thought I’d run through another top 10ish list with a difference, Asian horror and their cash-in remakes… I say ‘ish’ because I couldn’t finish it as it was making me angry.
Ringu (1998) Japan. The most successful horror film in Japanese history. Directed by Hideo Nakata’ who is responsible for a few more entries on this list. Ringu is unnerving and creepy, especially over the last half hour or so, a classic of the genre. Stylistically, Ringu would have to be one of the most influential horror movies of the last few decades. Spawned three additional movies: Rasen, Ring 2 and Ring 0: Birthday; all of which are diluted versions of the original. It’s easy to see why it was incredibly popular as there was nothing like it before… unfortunately we can’t say the same about movies since its release.
The Ring (2002) US. Naomi Watts. Big budget US remake starring Naomi Watts and directed by Gore Verbinski. Unexpectedly for a huge Hollywood remake, this was actually a pretty good teenage horror film. Helped by a good performance from Naomi Watts, it made a huge amount of money at the box-office and paved the way for the countless remakes of other Asian horror… so it has a lot to answer for…
Ju-on: The Grudge (2003) Japan. A volunteer social worker is cursed and haunted by the vengeful spirits that live in the house of an elderly woman. Creepy blue kid with black eyes and his seriously screwed up mother. It has some genuinely creepy moments.
The Grudge (2004) US. More of the same, remade with Sarah Michelle Geller. As with the US remake of the Ring this has higher production values but adds little to the original.
Dark Water (2002) Japan. More similar Japanese ghost themes. A divorcee and her daughter move into a rundown apartment block… there’s a leak in the ceiling. She discovers that the water is coming from an upstairs apartment that was previously occupied by a girl of similar age to her daughter, the girl went missing.
Dark Water (2005) US. Rubbish and pointless remake that has nothing really going for it apart from Jennifer Connolly who I’ll watch in anything.
The Eye (2002) Hong Kong. Apparently the original is really good. I haven’t seen it as I can’t be bothered since I saw the woeful ‘Bangkok Dangerous’ remake the directors did of their own better original.
The Eye (2008) US. Bigger budget remake by French co-directors David Moreau and Xavier Palud who made the far superior ‘Them’ in 2006. An eye transplant allows the recipient to see dead people. Jessica Alba is always good to look at, pity she didn’t look elsewhere for another role.
Shutter (2004) Thailand. – Tartan Asia Extreme. I’ve not seen the original but can only imagine that it is so much better than the remake.
Shutter (2008) Poland/US. I use the term loosely, ‘starring’ Joshua Jackson and Rachael Taylor as a newlywed couple who move to Japan for the husbands’ new job as a fashion photographer. There’s a car accident and a young girl dies… strange blurs appear on his photographs. His wife thinks they may be the spirit of the girl from the accident… Rubbish.
One Missed Call (2004) Japan. Directed by Takashi Mike who’s more famously known for the brutal and disturbing ‘Ichi The killer’ and ‘Audition’, of which both are worth checking out. A Japanese ghost story with possession themes revolving around people receiving calls from their future selves as they succumb to violent deaths. Another ghost with long black hair…
One Missed Call (2008) US. Unintentionally hilarious remake. Woeful…
Into The Mirror (2003) South Korea. Haven’t seen it, but I saw the US remake on the strength of Alexandre Aja as the director….
Mirrors (2008) US. And I wish I hadn’t. Aja’s worst movie. He did good things with the ‘Hills Have Eyes’ remake… he should have quit while he was ahead.
I can’t be bothered to do any more. There are sequels aplenty to Ringu and The Grudge… When I first saw Ringu at the now defunct Valhalla Cinema in Glebe, it was a new kind of creepy horror film with a look and feel which I’d never seen before. That initial feeling has been dissipated by all the remakes that have followed.
Japan especially needs to come up with something other than long-black-haired-big-eyed ghosts. We’ve seen it too often now and it’s lost whatever shock value it once had. More importantly though, Hollywood needs to come up with something original for a change. The countless remakes are making the big studios some easy money so it’s highly unlikely that they will stop the by-numbers remakes any time soon. They’ve trawled through Asia and Europe for movies to remake and now appear to have turned their sites on remaking American horror… eating their own. Maybe I’ll rant about that soon.